On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2015, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:53:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On 18 September 2015 at 15:07, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:45:50PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > >> v1 => v2: > > > >> - New patch: Also fixing /dev/hw_random => /dev/hwrng in Kconfig > > > >> - Fix 2099 => 2009 typo in commit log > > > >> - Fix 'number of random numbers sourced' return value > > > >> - Treat devm_clk_get()'s return value correctly > > > >> - Check return value of clk_prepare_enable() > > > >> - Use sysfs_streq() instead of manually stripping '\n' from sysfs > > > > > > > > All applied. Thanks. > > > > > > Just to be clear. Which patches have you applied? > > > > All of your patches. > > I think it's okay for you to take all but patch 6. > > Patch 6 is an ARM patch and needs to go into ARM SoC via > STMicroelectronics STi tree. Hi Herbert, I see that your tree is 8 days old, so this may have been resolved already, but would you be kind enough to ensure you remove the 6th (ARM) patch from your repo please? I wouldn't want it to cause conflicts and for Maxime and yourself to get shouted at by Linus. Much appreciated. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html