On 08/13/2015 11:26 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:14:11PM -0700, Tadeusz Struk wrote: >> >> Right, but we don't need that anymore. > > Why not? If you reduce the size without moving the buffer wouldn't > it begin with a bunch of zeroes and wouldn't you lose the real bytes > at the end? > If you don't like the first option then we still need this, as you pointed out. ---8<--- Change memcpy to memmove because the copy is done within the same buffer. diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c index fe352a6..e87f510 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/qat/qat_common/qat_asym_algs.c @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static void qat_rsa_cb(struct icp_qat_fw_pke_resp *resp) } if (areq->dst_len != req->ctx->key_sz) - memcpy(areq->dst, ptr, areq->dst_len); + memmove(areq->dst, ptr, areq->dst_len); akcipher_request_complete(areq, err); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
