Compiling the talitos driver with my GCC 4.3.1 e500v2 cross-compiler
resulted in a failed build due to the anonymous union/structures
introduced in this commit:
crypto: talitos - enhanced talitos_desc struct for SEC1
The build error was:
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: error: unknown field 'len' specified in initializer
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: warning: missing braces around initializer
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:56: warning: (near initialization for 'zero_entry.<anonymous>')
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:57: error: unknown field 'j_extent' specified in initializer
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: error: unknown field 'eptr' specified in initializer
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
drivers/crypto/talitos.h:58: warning: (near initialization for 'zero_entry')
make[2]: *** [drivers/crypto/talitos.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/crypto] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
This patch eliminates the errors by relying on the C standard's
implicit assignment of zero to static variables.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Sierra <asierra@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/crypto/talitos.h | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/talitos.h b/drivers/crypto/talitos.h
index 314daf5..163cfe7 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/talitos.h
+++ b/drivers/crypto/talitos.h
@@ -52,12 +52,7 @@ struct talitos_ptr {
__be32 ptr; /* address */
};
-static const struct talitos_ptr zero_entry = {
- .len = 0,
- .j_extent = 0,
- .eptr = 0,
- .ptr = 0
-};
+static const struct talitos_ptr zero_entry;
/* descriptor */
struct talitos_desc {
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
