On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Martin Willi wrote: > > I get less constant numbers between different runs when using sec=0, > hence I've used sec=1. Below are the numbers of "average" runs for the > AEAD measuring cycles; I'll use cycles in the individual patch notes in > a v2. If you're going to use sec you need to use at least 10 in order for it to be meaningful as shorter values often result in bogus numbers. Of course sec=10 takes a long time which is why cycles is the preferred method. What sort of variance do you see with cycles? Do you get the same variance for other algorithms, e.g., cbc/aes? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
