On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:19:54PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:55:17AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > > > > So, I will create a 2nd wait queue in random.c for uninterruptible waits, > > change the get_blocking_random_bytes back to void and use wait_event to wait > > for the initialization. > > Hold your horses. You don't need a second queue, you just need to > change wake_up_interruptible to wake_up. > > Hmm, in fact shouldn't this be wake_up_all? Otherwise what are the > other getrandom(2) callers going to do? Ted? Yes, this should definitely be wake_up_all() - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
