On 5/8/2015 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:12:00 PM santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.
This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
interface based on the booting architecture.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++
include/linux/property.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/property.h>
/**
@@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
return count;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
+
+bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
+{
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ?
In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OF
Yes, but IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) causes the check to be optimized away by the
compiler if CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
Sure but my point was why you need it when just 'dev->of_node' check
is enough. May be I missed something.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
