On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 16:08 +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Other patches that are in the kernel that I wrote (e.g.
> the crypto/drbg.c) have the same license as above, but use
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") -- Thus I would think that leaving it as is should be
> ok.
Why not submit the trivial patches to make the license comment and the
MODULE_LICENSE() macro match in those files too?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
