Re: DRBG seeding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2015, 23:26:18 schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

>On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> I do not see a specific requirement in SP800-90A about the quality of the
>> noise source.
>
>Well it explicitly says that you cannot use a DRBG.  In the worst
>case get_random_bytes is completely deterministic.
>
>> That said, I already developed an in-kernel version of /dev/random. I sent
>> the patch to LKML some half year ago. If I understood Ted Tso right, there
>> is no general objection against adding that in-kernel interface. See [1]
>> for the thread.
>> 
>> Furthermore, I already started working on updating the DRBG to use that in-
>> kernel /dev/random interface.
>> 
>> Shall I pursue that work in earnest now?
>> 
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/11/276
>
>Yes I think we should do this.

Ok, I will work on that after I added the global lock to the DRBG.
>
>Thanks,


Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux