On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:09:40PM +0100, Andy Polyakov wrote: > I have no problems with reusing assembly modules in kernel context. Awesome, thank you for clarifying this. > I'd prefer if it can be arranged in way similar to bsaes-armv7 module, > i.e. we work together on shared copy of module that generates assembly > that can be then compiled for OpenSSL or kernel. Is it sensible? Sure, that sounds good to me. > BTW, why stop at SHA256? There is SHA512 and NEON SHA1... The kernel already has NEON SHA-1 and SHA-512, but for some reason is lacking SHA-256. I have not tested how they compare to yours though. Sami -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
