On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:48:23 -0400 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steven, > > > Since the only objection raised was the too-newiness of GCC 4.9.2/5.0, what > would you consider a good time-line for removal? > > I haven't heard any "over my dead body" objections, so I guess that trying > to remove it while no distribution was shipping the compiler that would make > it possible was premature. > > Although, on the other hand, I'd be happy if we can have a reasonable date > (that is before my kid goes to college), preferably even before the next > LSF/MM so that we could have a mission accomplished thingie with a round > of beers and commemorative t-shirts. Perhaps give it 2 years? With fair notice that it will soon be gone? In 2 years I should be up to gcc 4.9 ;-) I still need to test it out. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
