Hi Stephan, On 03/08/2015 11:20 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote: > As you may know, I am working on libkcapi [1] to cover the user space AF_ALG > interface and provide an easy-to use interface for applications. > > I am now trying to cover your interface proposal there and also measure the > speed of it. What bothers me currently is the following: how would I be able > to detect whether the implemented support is available in the current kernel? You don't need to detect that. You can just use the new interface, and in the older kernels without AIO support in skcipher it will seamlessly fallback to the synchronous interface. The only problem is that the socket layer didn't like asynch operations before commit 06539d3071067ff146a9bffd1c801fa56d290909. The way it can be tackled for the older kernels is the distros will need update their kernels with the mentioned commit. They should do it anyway because it looks like that was a bug. One other thing to keep in mind is - to be able to see the benefit of AIO you need to use some encryption offload engine, where you can asynchronously offload multiple operations. With my dh895xxcc engine I see around 8x throughput improvement. Regards, Tadeusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
