Re: [PATCH] crypto: aesni - disable "by8" AVX CTR optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16 December 2014 at 22:49, James Yonan <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15/12/2014 12:26, James Yonan wrote:
>>
>> Mathias,
>>
>>>> I'm seeing some anomalous results with the "by8" AVX CTR optimization in
>>>> 3.18.
>>>
>>>
>>> the patch you're replying to actually *disabled* the "by8" variant for
>>> v3.17 as it had another bug related to wrong counter handling in GCM.
>>> The fix for that particular issue only made it to v3.18, so the code
>>> got re-enabled only for v3.18. But it looks like that there's yet
>>> another bug :/
>>
>>
>> Right, I should have clarified that I initially suspected the "by8"
>> variant was to blame because your patch that disables it resolves the
>> discrepancy.
>>
>>>> In particular, crypto_aead_encrypt appears to produce different
>>>> ciphertext
>>>> from the same plaintext depending on whether or not the optimization is
>>>> enabled.
>>>>
>>>> See the attached patch to tcrypt that demonstrates the discrepancy.
>>>
>>>
>>> I can reproduce your observations, so I can confirm the difference,
>>> when using the "by8" variant compared to other AES implementations.
>>> When applying this very patch (commit 7da4b29d496b ("crypto: aesni -
>>> disable "by8" AVX CTR optimization")) -- the patch that disables the
>>> "by8" variant -- on top of v3.18 the discrepancies are gone. So the
>>> behavior is bound to the "by8" optimization, only.
>>
>>
>> Right -- this is exactly what I'm seeing as well.
>>
>>> As it was Chandramouli, who contributed the code, maybe he has a clue
>>> what's wrong here. Chandramouli?
>>
>>
>> A few more observations:
>>
>> * Encryption produces bad ciphertext only when the size of plaintext
>> exceeds a certain threshold.  In test_aead_encrypt_consistency in the
>> tcrypt patch, I found that data_size must be >= 128 to produce bad
>> ciphertext.
>>
>> * Encrypting then decrypting data always gets back to the original
>> plaintext, no matter what the size.
>>
>> * The bad ciphertext from encryption is only evident when the same
>> encrypt operation is performed on a different AES implementation and the
>> ciphertexts are compared.
>>
>> * When the encrypt operation produces bad ciphertext, the generated auth
>> tag is actually correct, so another AES implementation that decrypts the
>> ciphertext will end up with corrupted plaintext that succeeds
>> authentication.

Hi James,

I gave it a shot since Chandramouli does not seem to respond... :(

>
> Another interesting observation:
>
> * bug only occurs when key size is 128 bits, not 192 or 256.

Thank you for your exhaustive analysis. The data size >= 128 bytes and
a key size of 128 were the key bits to this puzzle. The code is plain
wrong for 128 bit keys.
I'll send a patch soon.


Regards,
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux