On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 03:43:42PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:26:51AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > > What about to use a fallback algorithm that does not need to touch > > FPU/SIMD in such cases? We would not need cryptd at all and it would > > keep the requests in the right order because we don't defer them. > > This would be bad for throughput since the fallback is many orders > of magnitude slower than aesni. Sure, but could be an option if this is really a rare case. Anyway, I don't mind too much about the solution as long as we get it to work :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
