On Monday, April 28, 2014 at 11:53:23 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 09:28:41PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, April 28, 2014 at 12:24:41 PM, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 01:01:42PM +0300, Horia Geanta wrote: > > > > GFP_ATOMIC memory allocation could fail. > > > > In this case, avoid NULL pointer dereference and notify user. > > > > > > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.2+ > > > > Cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Patch applied to the crypto tree. Thanks. > > > > Hi Herbert, > > > > Don't you instead want to apply my 11-patch series from > > Message-Id: <1398362722-16430-1-git-send-email-marex@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: [PATCH 00/11] crypto: caam: Error reporting fixes > > which actually fixes this SPRINTFCAT() horror properly please ? > > This patch is going into the current release while your patches > are better suited for the next merge window. I agree with you that we're rather late in the RC now, but I also believe this patch is just hiding the real bug and that we should fix the root cause of the problem instead of adding a plaster over it. I also believe that while my 11-patch series is big, it should go into -stable eventually, since it fixes the real problem. Best regards, Marek Vasut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
