On 25 February 2014 10:08, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:21:22AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> For the authenticate-only data, this is manageable as you are only >> dealing with input, but when dealing with both in- and output, as in >> the core of CCM, it becomes very tedious. >> So instead, I have opted for an inner blkcipher instance which takes >> care of all of that. Could you suggest another approach that if >> preferable? > > I don't think the walk helper actually needs the tfm apart from > getting a couple of parameters out of it, so perhaps we can just > change the helper to not depend on a tfm. > That seems like a less hacky approach. I'll cook something up and put it on the list. Cheers, Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
