On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:44:31AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > > If this patch is correct, better to let CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED > share the same code. > > And do we need a comment "/* fall through */" between CPU_UP_CANCELED > and CPU_DOWN_FAILED (or it is another bug, need a 'break' statement) ? > > At last, also better to let CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED share > the same code (if need a 'break'), or share the most of code (if "fall > through"). > CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED can share the code. Same is true for CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
