On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:15:00PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > the whole patchset is more complicated than my brain. > > > > It isn't that complex, is it? I mean, the difficult part - using > > multiple pwqs on unbound wq - already happened, and even that wasn't > > too complex as it in most part synchronized the behaviors between > > per-cpu and unbound workqueues. All that NUMA support is doing is > > mapping different pwqs to different issuing CPUs. > > Oh, BTW, please feel free to rebase your patchset on top of the > current wq/for-3.10. I'll take care of the conflicts with the numa > one, if there are any. Sorry, never mind. I'm cherry picking wq->mutex patches. Will apply the rebased versions in a couple hours. Let's base everything else on top of those. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
