Re: [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:03:53PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> > +enomem:
>> > +       free_workqueue_attrs(tmp_attrs);
>> > +       if (pwq_tbl) {
>> > +               for_each_node(node)
>> > +                       kfree(pwq_tbl[node]);
>>
>> It will free the dfl_pwq multi times.
>
> Oops, you're right.  We need to do
>
>
>         for_eahc_node(node)
>                 if (pwq_tbl[node] != dfl_pwq)
>                         kfree(pwq_tbl[node]);
>         kfree(dfl_pwq);

I also missed.
we still need to put_unbound_pool() before free(pwq)

>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux