On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:19:26AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:08:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 04:34:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/ > > > > > > > > > > So the change above becomes unnecessary > > > > > > > > Very good. Then this patch can be safely dropped. > > > > > > So should I take this patch or not? > > > > This clk patch, no. The sahara patch, yes, if it is fine for you. > > But will the second patch work fine without the first? It will work once a device is registered. The necessary clocks for it will be provided by the devicetree then. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
