[Apologies for the dupe, fixing stupid typo for netdev address... -ENOCAFFEINE] I hesitate to reward the squeaky wheel, but in the community spirit, here goes... Please fix the subject for future submissions. The subject should be a short, one line description of the patch. It helps if the subject includes the section of the code you are affecting. Also, if you are resending a patch after addressing review comments, change the tag to [PATCH v2] etc. will indicate that. For example: [PATCH v2] crypto: add support for the NIST CMAC hash This keeps the maintainers from having to hand edit your patch, which dramatically slows them down. The goal is to get to a patch that can be applied as-is after review. On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 07:57 -0500, Tom St Denis wrote: > Hey all, > > Here's an updated patch which addresses a couple of build issues and > coding style complaints. > > I still can't get it to run via testmgr I get > > [ 162.407807] alg: No test for cmac(aes) (cmac(aes-generic)) > > Despite the fact I have an entry for cmac(aes) (much like xcbc(aes)...). > > Here's the patch to bring 3.8-rc4 up with CMAC ... All of this commentary should go after the '---' separator; the maintainer will have to hand edit it out otherwise. It's good information, it's just the wrong place. There should be a short description here of the patch, if needed. You may be fine with the one line description in this case, or you could point to the RFC, etc. > Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tstdenis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > crypto/Kconfig | 8 ++ > crypto/Makefile | 1 + > crypto/cmac.c | 317 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > crypto/testmgr.c | 9 ++ > crypto/testmgr.h | 52 +++++++ > include/uapi/linux/pfkeyv2.h | 1 + > net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c | 17 +++ You may be asked to split out the net changes into a separate patch, but since you are adding the user at the time you add the code, you may not. > 7 files changed, 405 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 crypto/cmac.c > > diff --git a/crypto/Kconfig b/crypto/Kconfig > index 4641d95..5ac2c7f 100644 > --- a/crypto/Kconfig > +++ b/crypto/Kconfig > @@ -301,6 +301,14 @@ config CRYPTO_XCBC > http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/modes/proposedmodes/ > xcbc-mac/xcbc-mac-spec.pdf > > +config CRYPTO_CMAC > + tristate "CMAC support" > + depends on EXPERIMENTAL > + select CRYPTO_HASH > + select CRYPTO_MANAGER > + help > + NIST CMAC cipher based MAC Pointers to the docs as for XCBC above would be useful here. > diff --git a/crypto/cmac.c b/crypto/cmac.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..1ffeea7 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/crypto/cmac.c > @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (C)2006 USAGI/WIDE Project Add your copyright info, 2013? > +static int crypto_cmac_digest_setkey(struct crypto_shash *parent, > + const u8 *inkey, unsigned int keylen) > +{ > + unsigned long alignmask = crypto_shash_alignmask(parent); > + struct cmac_tfm_ctx *ctx = crypto_shash_ctx(parent); > + int bs = crypto_shash_blocksize(parent); > + u8 *consts = PTR_ALIGN(&ctx->ctx[0], alignmask + 1); > + int x, y, err = 0; > + u8 msb, mask; > + > + switch (bs) { > + case 16: > + mask = 0x87; > + break; > + case 8: > + mask = 0x1B; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; /* only support 64/128 bit block ciphers */ Checkpatch doesn't warn, but this comment would probably be preferred to be on a line by itself. > + for (x = 0; x < 2; x++) { > + /* if msb(L * u^(x+1)) = 0 then just shift, > + otherwise shift and xor constant mask */ This comment is incorrectly formatted; I see checkpatch.pl from 3.7-rc4 didn't pick it up, which is interesting. /* * if msb(L * u^(x+1)) = 0 then just shift, * otherwise shift and xor constant mask */ Though I'll note that doing grep '/\*' crypto/*.c | grep -v '\*/' | less provides evidence that it also commonly /* is msb.... */ > + /* shift left */ > + for (y = 0; y < (bs - 1); y++) > + consts[x*bs + y] = > + ((consts[x*bs + y] << 1) | > + (consts[x*bs + y+1] >> 7)) & 255; So, here is a case where you fixed two warnings at the same time, but made one of them irrelevant in the process -- this should have braces around the single statement. checkpatch.pl complained initially because there was a one-line statement, but would not have complained if it looked like you have it now. Also, probably want a spaces in the y+1, if not the multiplication. > + > + consts[x*bs + bs - 1] = > + ((consts[x*bs + bs - 1] << 1) ^ > + (msb ? mask : 0)) & 255; > + > + /* copy up as require */ Minor English nit: required? > + if (x == 0) > + memcpy(&consts[(x+1)*bs], &consts[x*bs], bs); perhaps some spacing, though I'm personally OK with it. > diff --git a/crypto/testmgr.h b/crypto/testmgr.h > index b5721e0..9688bfe 100644 > --- a/crypto/testmgr.h > +++ b/crypto/testmgr.h > @@ -1639,6 +1639,58 @@ static struct hash_testvec hmac_sha256_tv_template[] = { > }, > }; > > +#define CMAC_AES_TEST_VECTORS 4 > + > +static struct hash_testvec aes_cmac128_tv_template[] = { > + { > + .key = "\x2b\x7e\x15\x16\x28\xae\xd2\xa6\xab" > + "\xf7\x15\x88\x09\xcf\x4f\x3c", There does seem to be some inconsistencies in the test vector formatting, but it seems to be pretty common for the hex dumps to put 8 bytes in each part of the string, and to most line of the strings up. Doing this alignment is how I found the missing \x in your first submission. > + .plaintext = zeroed_string, > + .digest = "\xbb\x1d\x69\x29\xe9\x59\x37\x28\x7f" > + "\xa3\x7d\x12\x9b\x75\x67\x46", > + .psize = 0, > + .ksize = 16, > + }, > + > + { The rest of the file uses "}, { " between test vectors. Because you are working in the networking code, you should cc netdev -- they need to review the following hunks. I don't know what the allocation policy is for adding algorithm numbers in pfkeyv2, but they would know if you are creating a conflict with other work. > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pfkeyv2.h b/include/uapi/linux/pfkeyv2.h > index 0b80c80..d61898e 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/pfkeyv2.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/pfkeyv2.h > @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ struct sadb_x_kmaddress { > #define SADB_X_AALG_SHA2_512HMAC 7 > #define SADB_X_AALG_RIPEMD160HMAC 8 > #define SADB_X_AALG_AES_XCBC_MAC 9 > +#define SADB_X_AALG_AES_CMAC_MAC 10 > #define SADB_X_AALG_NULL 251 /* kame */ > #define SADB_AALG_MAX 251 > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c > index 4ce2d93..bd6f227 100644 > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.c > @@ -265,6 +265,23 @@ static struct xfrm_algo_desc aalg_list[] = { > } > }, > { > + .name = "cmac(aes)", > + > + .uinfo = { > + .auth = { > + .icv_truncbits = 96, > + .icv_fullbits = 128, > + } > + }, > + > + .desc = { > + .sadb_alg_id = SADB_X_AALG_AES_CMAC_MAC, > + .sadb_alg_ivlen = 0, > + .sadb_alg_minbits = 128, > + .sadb_alg_maxbits = 128 > + } > +}, > +{ > .name = "xcbc(aes)", > > .uinfo = { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
