> -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Williams [mailto:djbw@xxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:53 PM > To: Liu Qiang-B32616 > Cc: vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ira W. Snyder > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Raid: enable talitos xor offload for > improving performance > > On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 11:15 +0000, Liu Qiang-B32616 wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > > > Ping? > > Can you apply these patches? Thanks. > > > > I'm working my way through them. > > The first thing I notice is that xor_chan->desc_lock is taken > inconsistently. I.e. spin_lock_irqsave() in talitos_process_pending() > and spin_lock_bh() everywhere else. Have you run these patches with > lockdep? Thanks for your reply. LOCKDEP is enabled as you suggested, there is not any info about "inconsistent lock state" displayed. I don't know whether it's enough. I'm confused about the attribute of DMA_INTERRUPT, my understanding is this interface is only used to trigger an interrupt (make sure all former operations are finished before switching to other channels), but fsl-dma will trigger an interrupt by "Programmed Error". I'm wondering whether other hardware are same with fsl-dma (the interrupt is a normal interrupt, but not an error) i.e. xscale-iop? If other hardware also trigger an interrupt by an abnormal error, maybe my patch 2/8 should be reverted because it violates the rules of this attribute. BTW, could you please reply in the patch if you have any comments. Thanks. > > -- > Dan > > ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���{ay� ʇڙ���f���h������_�(�階�ݢj"��������G����?���&��
