From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:16:08 +1100 > OK, so we grew by 1136 - 888 = 248. Keep in mind that 128 of > that is expected since we moved W onto the stack. Right. > I guess we could go back to the percpu solution, what do you > think? I'm not entirely sure, we might have to. sha512 is notorious for generating terrible code with gcc on 32-bit targets, so... The sha512 test in the glibc testsuite tends to timeout on 32-bit sparc. :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
