Re: [PATCH 21/21] MODSIGN: Apply signature checking to modules on module load [ver #3]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:14:31 +0000, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > We can have false positives, but at worst that make us report EINVAL
> > > > (bad signature) instead of ENOENT (no signature).
> > > 
> > > EKEYREJECTED please; that way it's the same as RHEL does now.
> > 
> > OK, sure (who knew that was there?).

Oh yes, I read these, but I didn't appreciate that those errnos had
existed for over 6 years.

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux