Jamie Iles <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> diff --git a/include/linux/crypto.h b/include/linux/crypto.h >> index de9adec..3e14cee 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/crypto.h >> +++ b/include/linux/crypto.h >> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ >> #define CRYPTO_ALG_DYING 0x00000040 >> #define CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC 0x00000080 >> >> +/* Set this bit if the algorithm provided is hardware accelerated but >> + * not available to userspace via instruction set or so. >> + */ >> +#define CRYPTO_ALG_KERN_ONLY 0x00000100 > > Would it be a bit clearer if this was CRYPTO_ALG_IS_UNPRIVILIGED and was > set the other way round (so instruction set based ones that users can > use)? I had to do a double take with KERN_ONLY. Actually I think Nikos's suggestion is the right one. Going the other way would be more intrusive. Of course I'm open to a better name than KERN_ONLY. Thanks! -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
