On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:45:44 +0200, Herbert Xu said: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 03:05:16AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > Are there any use cases where a config (probably embedded) would wantq > > CRYPTO_USER but not CRYPTO_NET? Would seem a shame to pull in the entire > > Since the CRYPTO_USER interface sits on top of netlink I don't > see how you could possibly avoid NET. Oh, OK. The original bug report looked like just some utility functions not defined, so I didn't pick up on the "it needs netlink" aspect of it.
Attachment:
pgp2Ru0A54ZJ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
