On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:36:18 +0200 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The CDPR (Current Descriptor Pointer Register) can be unreliable > > when trying to locate an offending descriptor. Handle that case by > > (a) not OOPSing, and (b) reverting to the machine internal copy of > > the descriptor header in order to report the correct execution unit > > error. > > > > Note: printing all execution units' ISRs is not effective because it > > results in an internal time out (ITO) error and the EU resetting its > > ISR value (at least when specifying an invalid key length on an SEC > > 2.2/MPC8313E). > > > > Reported-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > please test, as it seems I cannot reproduce the descriptor not found > > case. > > So what's the verdict Kim, should I take this patch or not? sure - I've verified it does at least satisfy Sven's shouldn't-oops comment. btw, can you take a look at applying this also?: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg05996.html It makes IPSec AH work for async crypto implementations. Thanks, Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
