On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:08:06PM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > I think the only value of the priority update is, if we can do it > without removing existing transforms. If this is not possible > it is much easier to just delete the algorithm in question and > to build a new one with the updated priority. We don't want to automatically update a value that the user may have previously set. So I think updating instances on mass won't work anyway. Besides, an instance may depend on an algorithm which should not influence its priority value at all (e.g., if it's only used during setkey). So let's just remove that and make this simpler. Thanks! -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
