On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:26:33AM +0330, Hamid Nassiby wrote: > > As you know, I posted my problem again to crypto list and no one answered. > Now I > emphasize one aspect of the problem as a concept related to IPSec protocol, > free > of my problem's nature, and I hope to get some guidelines at this time. The > question is as following: > If IPSec delivers IP packets to hardware crypto accelerator in sequential > manner > (e.g, packets in order: 1, 2, 3, ..., 36, 37, 38,...) and crypto accelerator > possibly returns back packets out of entering order to IPSec (e.g, packet > 37 is returned back before the packet 36 to IPSec, so the order of packets > is > not the same before entering crypto accelerator and after exiting it); Is it > possible to rise any problem here? We do not allow such reordering. All crypto drivers must ensure ordering within a single tfm. Between different tfms there is no ordering requirement. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
