On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:14:16PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > > If I didn't get lost in expanding all those macros, I think the above can end up > with what is essentially a negative value for the index of buf. Shouldn't the > right-hand side of the statement be > > (u32 *)PTR_ALIGN(&buf[PADLOCK_ALIGNMENT], PADLOCK_ALIGNMENT); > > That resolves to an index for buf from 0 to (PADLOCK_ALIGNMENT - 1). PTR_ALIGN (and ALIGN) rounds up, not down. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
