On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:29:03AM +0100, Martin Willi wrote: > Add TFC padding to all packets smaller than the boundary configured > on the xfrm state. If the boundary is larger than the PMTU, limit > padding to the PMTU. Thanks for the update Martin. However, I still think it's more complicated than it needs be. In particular, why would we need a boundary at all? Setting it to anything other than the PMTU would seem to defeat the purpose of TFC for packets between the boundary and the PMTU. If we can get rid of tfc.pad, we can simplify the user-interface change to just adding an xfrm_state flag. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
