Re: [PATCH] crypto: padlock: fix for non-64byte aligned data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:39:56PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:41:41AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> >
> > Yes, CONFIG_PREEMPT is active in my test system's kernel.
> 
> OK, can you see if the problem is still reproducible without
> preemption?

Yes, it is. I just redid the test with a CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE kernel,
memory corruption occurs every time.

Greetings, Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux