On 9/23/2010 3:44 PM, Tirumala Marri wrote:
Did you look at this changelog before sending? It just deletes 4000
lines of code??
[Marri] The reason I have to send it in different file is the size of the
patch.
There seem to be issue with patch sizes 200k or more.
Read the rest of what I wrote:
Moving and renaming code in one patch makes it very difficult to verify
the result. When generalizing code the first thing I want to see with a
very quick glance at the patch(es) is that the existing implementation
is not harmed. One way to go about this is to first identify the
portions of existing code that you want to reuse in your driver and the
pieces that are truly ppc440spe specific. Move the ppc440spe pieces to
their own file (get this reviewed and approved by the ppc440spe
authors). The remaining code in adma.c will be assumed generic. You
can then have another patch to do a simple s/ppc440spe/ppc4xx/ in adma.c
(no other logic changes or code movement). Then you can introduce your
ppc460ex unique implementation that calls into adma.c.
The patch would not be so large if you leave the existing code where it
is and move the implementation specific pieces to their own file.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
