On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:17:59AM -0500, Lee Nipper wrote: > > But I am curious why this patch > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg04660.html > > wasn't nudged along too. It also fixed a talitos problem with ahash. > I don't mind if it needs to wait until later; I'm just curious. If it causes a crash or has other serious implications then I will push it. However, if it simply results in a broken hash computation, a failure that should be fairly obvious, then it can wait til the next cycle. When I looked at it previously I thought it fell into the latter category, but I might be mistaken. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
