Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have no idea where this should finally be implemented, since it slows > down XTS on non-accelerated CPUs. Maybe a seperate xts-aes-padlock > driver would make sense depending on how specific this is to VIA > Padlock, i.e. how it performs on other non-XTS-capable accelerators. We can solve that by instantiating both the ECB-based XTS and the current XTS, but by increasing the current XTS's priority value. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
