On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:26:46AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote: > > Another workflow question: > Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the > old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what > order? > Or does everyone have a different opionion, in which case: What is > yours? It depends on what you're working on. For this case in particular, sending the missing bits instead of the whole thing is my preferred solution. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
