Obviously, this should have been named CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in compress.c Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave it this way? Richard On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:30, Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > crypto/compress.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/compress.c b/crypto/compress.c > index 1ee3570..c33f076 100644 > --- a/crypto/compress.c > +++ b/crypto/compress.c > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > * > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free > - * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) > + * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) > * any later version. > * > */ > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int crypto_init_compress_ops(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) > > ops->cot_compress = crypto_compress; > ops->cot_decompress = crypto_decompress; > - > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 1.6.6.1 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
