On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:06:06AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Herbert Xu | 2009-07-15 08:48:47 [+0800]: > > >Yes, that should be enough. You don't even ipsec-tools, just > >a manual SA setup with ip xfrm should be good enough. > > I did not get that far: > > |alg: hash: Chunking test 1 failed for sha1-padlock > |00000000: e9 95 22 0c 1b d1 0f 5f f1 fa ee 74 7d 27 cd b2 > |00000010: 99 f2 ad 73 > |alg: hash: Chunking test 1 failed for sha256-padlock > |00000000: 9e 49 25 fa b3 a8 45 de 53 e9 9f d0 e8 7d 2c 33 > |00000010: 09 51 6b 33 15 cb e0 4e 22 c0 04 1b 1e 25 ad c9 > |padlock: Using VIA PadLock ACE for SHA1/SHA256 algorithms. > > Do you think that it is something obvious or should I dig into it? Can you please pull my tree again? There were quite a few bugs that I fixed last night. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
