On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:18:52PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:14:29AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > > > I posted some numbers for the actual softirq based version with the > > first patchset, see: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg03035.html > > Thanks, but I was thinking of softirq numbers vs. workqueue numbers. > I have just some numbers from a network based parallelization that uses threads. So it's probaply not really comparable to the pcrypt version. To compare the pcrypt version, we would need a thread based padata version. If you think that it is needed I could care about this as soon as I finished the ahash work. Anyway, here are numbers for the network based versions: I did forwarding tests with the thread version and two quad core machines (Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600): linux-2.6.25.2 + thread based (network) parallelization Packetsize: 1420 byte Encryption: aes192-sha1 Unidirectional throughput: 660 Mbit/s (tcp) After rewriting this to use remote softirqs I've got with the same environment: linux-2.6-git (Dec 01, 2008) + softirq based (network) parallelization Packetsize: 1420 byte Encryption: aes192-sha1 Unidirectional throughput: 910 Mbit/s (tcp) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
