On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 09:52 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 07:28:46PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > Yeah. That sucks. We should probably stick in an skb-friendly slab size > > and see what happens on network benchmarks. > > I don't see how that's going to help since we don't want it to > cross page boundaries either (having just wasted a day tracking > down a virtual networking bug because of slab debugging and > crossing page boundaries). I'll bite.. what's wrong with page boundaries? Do we play per-SKB TLB games in virtual network drivers? -- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
