On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 17:00 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:49:41 -0600 Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The whole concept is quite hacky and nasty, isn't it?. It is, which is part of why we were trying to kill it. The primary users were thing growing buffers ala realloc. So we were pushing to change the callers to just do a realloc. But IPSEC doesn't fit well into that mold. The fundamental problem here for networking is that 1500 is not very close to a power of two and just about everything in the VM wants it to be. If we could get SKBs fitting more nicely in memory, I think it would cease to be a concern. -- http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
