Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote :

(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Mon,  9 Feb 2009 09:12:59 -0800 (PST)
bugme-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680

           Summary: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
                    probing on modules insertion attempt.
           Product: Drivers
           Version: 2.5
     KernelVersion: Any 2.6.29 release candidate
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
        AssignedTo: drivers_other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

hm, we don't seem to have a bugzilla category for crypto.

        ReportedBy: v.quequet-techniques@xxxxxxxxx


Latest working kernel version: 2.6.28.4
Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.29-rc1

I'll ask Rafael to track this as a post-2.6.28 regression.

Distribution:
Hardware Environment: IA32 i686 Athlon model 10
Software Environment: Pristine kernel 2.6.29-rc4-git1 + Debian Lenny/Sid
Problem Description: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
probing on modules insertion attempt:

  I can't say whether this abnormally long probe delay occurs on "padlock_aes"
or "padlock_sha" module insertion attempt or both.

  I do not have such hardware indeed.

I've never observed this problem so far with Linux version <= 2.6.28.4 .

Steps to reproduce:

Power-on your system ;-)

In hope my report will prove useful.


Neither of those drivers have changed in six months, so the breakage
must be elsewhere.

Hello,

I fear you're right:

It's setting up an LVM volume which takes over 20 seconds, sometimes more than 1 minute on my system when I run Linux 2.6.29-rcX... ; and no problem with Linux <= 2.6.28.4 though.

I understand this is quite a vague description of the trouble, and I'm considering more analysis in the near future.

This might be a Debian Lenny/Sid specific bug. I'm sorry for my eagerness to fill in my initial bug report, because I wrongly considered PadLock-related modules responsible for that delay.

I guess this should be easy for others to reproduce.

How long is the "long" delay?

Please do this:

	add "log_buf_len=1M" to the kernel boot command line
	reboot

	dmesg -n 8
	modprobe padlock_aes &
	sleep 1
	echo t > /prog/sysrq-trigger
	dmesg -s 1000000 > foo

and then send us `foo'.  Pleas avoid wordwrapping it.

This will permit us to see where `modprobe' is getting stuck.

No delay observed doing these commands ; I was wrong.

Thanks.

Thanks too.

On the Debian Lenny/Sid average user point of view, it is still a post-2.6.28 regression, though. Note: I only did comparisons between different Pristine kernel versions.

But I am sorry not having more accurate clues about that trouble.

In hope my report will prove useful.

Sincerely,
Valentin QUEQUET

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux