Russ Dill <russ.dill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I worked with this a bit, and since the IV has to be modified, it was > just easier to check for nbytes less than or equal to block size in my > own code and then back up src/dest pointers by iv_size and increase > the size by iv_size. (My IV is prepended to my data). On decryption I > do something similar by adding a buffer for the output of the IV. I suggest that we fix the CTS algorithm (i.e., give it a block size of 1 instead of whatever it is now, plus make it work properly for input equal or less than a block), and then implement RFC3962 on top of it. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html