On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 00:42 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:44:49PM +0200, Carlo E. Prelz wrote: > > Hello there. I see you are the person who pushed upwards changes > > related to the Linux crypto susbsystem for 2.6.27. I wanted to let you > > know that, on a Core2 laptop platform, the new code for the Camellia > > module generates different encrypted content. Both implementations > > work, but a file that was encrypted with pre-2.6.27 cannot be > > decrypted with the current code. > > > > Was this intentional? I saw no indication about this on the notes that > > went with the patch. > > No this is not intentional. Thanks for reminding me. > > Harvey, I think I'm going to revert the bitops change for now. > Please do, I still haven't managed to to track down why this changes any behavior, I'll resubmit at a later date if I ever figure it out. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html