On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:55:00PM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote: > > IIRC The first versions of VIA PadLock required the input data to be > aligned on 16-bytes boundaries and more importantly they always > finalised the hash. Therefore we had to collect all data before hashing > them. Ah yes, the finalisation is the killer. I'm working on a new sync hash interface that moves the state out of the tfm and was just thinking of how padlock-sha would work within that. Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
