Hi, Yes... It is intended not to patch OpenSSL twice. Besides the interface API, the internal does NOT resemble OCF in anyway. -Loc -----Original Message----- From: Herbert Xu [mailto:herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:03 AM To: Sebastian Siewior Cc: Loc Ho; Shasi Pulijala; linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RFC: Add CryptoAPI User Space Interface Support On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:32:24PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > >This should add support for OpenSSL. Please note that user of this > >patch musts patch OpenSSL. The OpenSSL patch can be found in > >OCF-Linux as this interface uses the same I/O control interface. > So this interface must stay as it in order not to patch openssl twice? I don't think compatibility with OCF is necessary at all. We should create an interface that is suitable for Linux first of all rather than concentrating on OCF. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
