* Herbert Xu | 2008-03-05 19:52:03 [+0800]: >On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:46:52PM +0100, Sebastian Siewior wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if we are allowed to modify the IV or if it should >> remain untouched. If it is possible to modify it, I could encrypt it >> inplace and save two memcpy(). >> I will check this tonight. > >I just had a quick look and it seems that you should be able to >store the result in the IV. Okey, >However this won't work for LRW since we need the IV to increment >it. But then again LRW seems to be fine as it is since its >arguments are already aligned by the blkcipher walker. I just browsed LRW and it seems that it does not encrypt the IV at all. Stefan: Didn't you report that both, XTS and LRW are broken on your padlock? If so, could you please post the backtrace? > >Thanks, Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
