* Loc Ho | 2008-01-21 17:29:13 [-0800]: >If that is the case, then in order to fully support async hashing, I would >need an async version of HASH interface and an async version of digest. Am I >correct? Yes. In case you support hmac+sha1 in HW and you don't do sha1 (as digest) at all you could skip that part. >Do you think it will be inconsistent if it is assumed that if the >functional setkey is not called, then it is digest. If it is called, then it >is hash. I would prefer to seperate them. However, this is one of those things where Herbert has the last word :) >-Loc Sebastian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
