Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:58:56 +0100
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070902224226.GA22869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1

> What about:

Looks good.
-Andi

>
> [crypto] do not use generic AES on i386 and x86_64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
  - From: Sebastian Siewior

Prev by Date: [PATCH] an XTS blockcipher mode implementation without partial blocks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] an XTS blockcipher mode implementation without partial blocks
Previous by thread: Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
Next by thread: Re: {twofish,aes}-{x86_64,i586} versus C implementations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel] [Gnu Classpath] [Gnu Crypto] [DM Crypt] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux