* Herbert Xu | 2007-08-02 17:28:25 [+0800]: >On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:23:51AM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote: >> >> The only difference I can see is, that crypto_tfm_alg_alignmask() is >> replaced with a static defined number instead of a lookup in a struct. >> IS this the optimization? > >Yes, the fact that the alignment mask is a constant allows >it to be optimised away. If this is that important, isn't it better to add/ replace the current _aligned call with such an optimized one? Or applies this kind of optimization only to this special driver where it is very expensive otherwise? >Cheers, Sebastian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
