Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Have you benchmarked this against lib/sha1.c? Please post the results. > Until then, I'm frankly skeptical that your unrolled version is faster > because when I introduced lib/sha1.c the rolled version therein won by > a significant margin and had 1/10th the cache footprint. I would always suggest to benchmark such functions with forced cold i/d caches (memset(x, 0, 5*1024*1024) and running some very large generated function every few iterations of the benchmark) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
